tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1749815302986742013.post8685890295676549455..comments2024-02-11T02:16:01.932-06:00Comments on Advanced Writing Theories: Gender Bias in Language Research?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00718057439826700446noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1749815302986742013.post-16745801370367316772010-01-08T16:48:07.233-06:002010-01-08T16:48:07.233-06:00I inclination not approve on it. I assume precise ...I inclination not approve on it. I assume precise post. Particularly the designation attracted me to be familiar with the intact story.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1749815302986742013.post-5070780837397826782009-12-27T18:03:52.090-06:002009-12-27T18:03:52.090-06:00Well I agree but I about the post should acquire m...Well I agree but I about the post should acquire more info then it has.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1749815302986742013.post-74222078479469785812007-04-29T21:13:00.000-06:002007-04-29T21:13:00.000-06:00Funny thing. It's been out there for a few months...Funny thing. It's been out there for a few months, but I finally decided to play with it a few nights ago - and then blogged about it. The next day or so, the WPA discussion started up. Something's in the air. <BR/><BR/>Oh, and apparently I'm mostly a boy. <BR/><BR/>I do find it interesting (regardless of how problematic the whole 'genie' is) is how it ascribes male attributes to the type of writing traditionally gendered masculine. But I've decided, after only a tiny bit of consideration, that I won't pontificate on gender and writing this time around, even though it does speak to these issues. Most people seem to be laughing at its conclusions. I'm not yet sure how I feel about them. Or why I felt compelled to try it out, for that matter.k8https://www.blogger.com/profile/07547334819703279971noreply@blogger.com